63
GoodWhat People Are Saying
The data provided is extremely limited for evaluating this firm from a client's perspective. While their Google and Avvo ratings are strong and they have published several multi-million dollar results, there are no actual client reviews about communication, compassion, or the attorney-client experience. An accident victim should schedule a consultation to assess these critical factors directly, as the available data only confirms their ability to secure large settlements, not how they treat clients during the process.
high Google rating (4.6/5)multiple multi-million dollar verdicts/settlementsstrong Avvo rating (9.0/10)no substantive client reviews availableno data on communication styleno information about fee structure
FMAL Score Breakdown
google rating
90
review volume
80
reddit presence
41
sentiment
57
case results
100
website quality
70
avvo tiebreaker
89
data sources
NaN
data source count
4
Firm Details
Practice Areas: product liability, injury lawyer, pedestrian accident, truck accident, personal injury
Languages: English
Free Consultation: Yes
Contingency Fee: Yes
Notable Results: $27,835,236.48; $46m; $14,779,305.28; $7,398,543.54; $27,835,236.48
Is this your firm?
Claim your profile to update your information, respond to reviews, and boost your FMAL Score.